On Fri, 8 Mar 2024, at 11:57, Charles Johnson wrote:

March 8, 1971: My father took me along with him to the Shrine auditorium to see the first fight between Muhammad ali and Joe Frazier. No fight since has captured the magic of that fight. Two men, both undefeated, and each with a claim of the heavyweight title. And the fight was great. 

 One of my fondest memories with my father.

My Reply:

​When I was young, my Dad got me boxing videos (VHS) which went back to bare knuckle days in the UK - and forward to the US Black domination of the art. Jack Johnson landed a single right upper cut on the body of Tommy Burns that lifted him clean off his feet! More remarkably, Burns landed back on his feet and carried on fighting! I encountered 'The Fight' through those videos and remember Fraser's left hook that floored Ali (my Dad called him both Clay and Ali). That single punch changed history - and Ali would continue after this setback and prove he was one of the greatest! My Dad taught me bare knuckle boxing and said 'They can hurt you and they can kill you - don't worry about the second one - don't show the effects of the first one and win in that way!' My Dad understood that Western Boxing specialised in punching and that I needed this to supplement the (Longfist) gongfu kicking I was learning.

​Interestingly, part of my background has involved the management of violence and thuggery. The UK has a weird mixture of uplifting Socialism (currently under attack) and crushing capitalist oppression. Yin and yang. I have witnessed lots of violence but never been to a professional boxing match - like that which you describe so touchingly. What you have written touched my heart - and is a clear example of your writing ability. Respect to your father - I feel that I met him in those few, well-chosen lines. My problem when young was that I had learned Chinese martial arts movements - but did not yet possess the understanding (or experience) to make them work in combat (I literally 'bounced-off' opponents who remained more bemused rather than hurt or put-off). I learned quickly that Westerners did not like kicking - so that gave me an edge (and to be weary of Gypsy people - as they are tough). In the old days, Chinese gongfu involved kicking practice for a long time (low, middle and high) before punching was introduced. The opposite to how martial arts are taught today - at least in the West.

​My Dad, instead, took me to two professional football games both involving Leicester City (he used to play for them in his youth) - and a Cricket game (Cricket is an old Celtic game that my Dad got good at in his youth despite it being dominated by the middle class snobs who could afford proper clothing) featuring Leicestershire County Cricket Club that was playing in Glastonbury (possibly against Glamorgan). I was once struck on the head by a Cricket bat and can attest to its efficacy! The boy ran away because I stood looking at him. The lump on my forehead was significant to say the least. The Boxers of old taught me to be strong - whilst Black people taught me 'not to show it'. 

​Still, Ali and Frazer inspired me for different reasons and in different ways. I was surprised to find that Fraser's right shoulder was permanently damaged and he had to throw an Orthodox straight right like a jab - but with no real power behind it (as a range-finder). This is why he put so much effort into his smashing lead-left hook! Fraser was also very humble and a true gentleman (important in the UK). It was the politics of Ali I liked. He just happened to wed this with the beat - all round - boxing skills the world has ever seen. I know that Bruce Lee used to watch videos of Ali dancing around the ring - and copied this movement - integrating it into his Jeet Kune Do. I also know that Ali sparred with a high-ranking US Karate-Do practitioner (after his retirement) and was still too-quick for the younger Karate man!

​When I got older, I got bigger and stronger. I became 'nasty' in my own way - particularly as a teenager. I looked mean and hungry - mostly because I was hungry - literally. My family did the best they could in trying circumstance - and yet when I came to live in London amongst affluent people - I could not believe how much food they had to eat! I used to live on about one-third of what they ate - and still pushed myself physically and mentally to prevail. This is why Tommy Hearns inspired me. I copied his 'punching' ability to augment my kicking ability. In the old Longfist Style - kicking is considered more important than punching due to historical reasons in ancient China. I think many old Masters carried swords or spears in their hands - and so kicking supplemented the use of weapons.

However, Master Chan Tin Sang (1924-1993) - who had fought and killed Imperial Japanese soldiers in Hong Kong during WWII - understood that 'punching' was important in the modern world and helped me devise an internal method for replicating what Tommy Hearns quite naturally did. I think Master Chan had seen how effective Karate-punching was as displayed by the Japanese - and it made him think about improvements. When i left home at 16 to go into further education - I encountered many more Black people and found that being able to fight was a respected ability. After some brutal encounters with my brothers - we became very good friends! They respected the ability 'not to show it' - and diplomatic relations developed from their.

Chinese prisoners who killed foreigners in the late Qing Dynasty - were forced to the execution-ground after a simple interrogation (with no legal defence). Four suspects in the ‘Gutian Religious Case’ include Du Zhuyi (杜朱衣), Zheng Huai (郑淮), Liu Xiangxing (刘祥兴) and Zhang Ch (张赤). In the early morning of August 1st, 1895, more than one-hundred members of the "Piety Association" (斋会 - Zhai Hui) situatin in Gutian County, Fujian Province - attacked Mount Hua - where British and American missionaries lived, resulting in the deaths of eleven British missionaries and other female Christian assistants. Many other people were injured. This incident became known as the "Gutian Religious Case" in the history books. This is one of the two largest religious-orientated single cases that happened during the late Qing Dynasty – with the other being the "Tianjin Religious Case" which happened in 1870. Western missionaries aggressively penetrated and took-over large parts of China and used brutality to force Chinese people to ‘convert’ to a religious they neither wanted nor understood. Every so often, this foreign aggression and brutality was met with ‘resistance’ primarily from the embittered peasant community – which generally paid dearly for its loyalty and bravery. ​

The suspects in the "Gutian Religious Case" were arrested by the Qing government. This group of photographs was found in a recently discovered album left by the Englishman John Charles Oswald (1856-1900), which recorded key scenes relating to the trial of the suspects. Oswald once ran a tea and horse racing business in Fuzhou, and it is not certain that these photographs were taken by him personally. After the "Zhaihui" congregation killed people, they robbed the missionary's residence and set fire to it. ​

The scene after the looting of the British and American missionaries' residence was very bloody. In the late Qing Dynasty, missionaries went deep into China to preach, and there were often conflicts between the church and the local people. The involvement of missionaries in the opium trade, forced land leases, and illegal act of shielding the faithful aroused the anger of the local people. The Gutian "Zhaihui" and the church have had long-standing grievances, with both encroaching upon the other’s territory. The church employed all kinds of illegal methods but continuously got away with their crimes – which included rape of Chinese women and girls. If the Chinese Authorities dared to act against this foreign criminality, then the foreign governments would often send in their armed forces and make matters far worse. When the ‘Piety Associations’ fought-back – they were invariably ‘blamed’ when caught and issued with the severest of punishments demanded by the church missionaries – who enjoyed watching the spectacle of scared men kneeling to be ‘beheaded’! ​

After the incident, foreigners in China reacted strongly. The British and American envoys in Beijing protested to the Qing Court and sent warships to intimidate along the coast of Fujian. The "New York Tribune" of the United States even clamoured to put China "under the gun" and subject it to "the most severe sanctions." ​

Du Zhuyi - one of the main criminals in the case - was kept in a cage. In his early years, he repeatedly failed the exams, and then he despaired of his career and joined the "Zhaihui". Because he couldn't understand the arbitrary behaviour of foreigners, he rebelled against their corruption. The "Zhaihui" is mostly comprised of the poor people at the bottom of society, and a small number of frustrated intellectuals and small businessmen. ​

The British who died were buried in Fuzhou. On August 5th, Emperor Guangxu decreed, "The case is serious. The generals (Bian Baoquan, Governor of Fujian and Zhejiang Province, General Qingyu of Fuzhou) should send troops to severely deal with the perpetrators and be punished in accordance with the law; The church residence was properly protected by the stern magistrates, and there was no need to do anything else," which shows the attitude of the pro-Western Qing Court. ​

Chinese, British, and American personnel involved in the investigation and trial of the case. On August 13th, an investigation team composed of British and American diplomats, military officers, and missionaries went to Gutian to investigate the incident and participate in the Qing government’s trial of the arrested suspects. Under their pressure, the Qing government offered high rewards and arrested hundreds of people. Among them, a large number of innocent people were implicated for being allegedly reported by others. ​

The scene before the execution. In order to quell the adverse effects caused by the case as soon as possible, the Qing government adopted a method of rapid arrest and rapid trial. The procedure was very simple, and the participants in the confirmed cases were immediately sentenced. By October 18th, the trial was completed in just over two months, and 92 people were finally determined to be guilty, of which 26 were sentenced to death, 17 were enlisted in the military, 5 were imprisoned for life, 27 were imprisoned for 10 years, and 5 were imprisoned for 5 years. 5 people to hold the stone pier for 3 years, 5 people hold the stone pier for 6 months, and 2 people hold the stone pier for 2 months. 

The executioners who carried-out the death penalties. During the trial of the case, the British and American authorities did not claim compensation, but only demanded that the perpetrators be punished. This is a rare case in modern history that caused heavy losses without financial compensation. Reference materials: Liu Guoping, "Research on Gutian Religious Cases in 1895", Yang Guanghui, "Public Opinion and Modern Religious Cases". 

Original Chinese Language Source Article: 
​古田教案
https://m.sohu.com/a/212640342_99937407