Certainly - when I first saw Goju Ryu in the Hereford Leisure Centre - I couldn't believe my eyes! To that point, I had only seen and physically experienced Wado Kai, Shotokan, and Shukokai - all Japanese arts - but never Okinawan styles. My teacher (Master Chan Tin Sang) told me Karate-Do had come from China - but that the Japanese had altered its physical techniques (deliberately removing the distinctly "Chinese" internal aspect) so that the transplanted arts now resembled Japanese sword arts. Bear in mind that this generation of Hakka-Chinese had just fought a brutal war with the Imperial Japanese - so Okinawa was always viewed as "Chinese" (or so I learned later). Remember, I was only in my mid-teens myself and did not understand things that clearly.

​As matters stood, I experienced three Japanese Karate-Do styles - and then I learned the basics of Goju Ryu from your good-self - and my gongfu teacher was astonished! He couldn't believe the integration of hard and soft! He kept asking me who you were and where you had trained! One time (during 1987) Master Chan came to Hereford to see me - and looked in at your class. He was too shy to interfere - as he wasn't sure of the Japanese involvement (if any) - and I didn't really know (for which he told me off). Until he passed away in 1993, he would sit at dinner-time and tell his Hakka friends about Goju Ryu - and get me to show the basic kata. The circular lower block seems to be the most obvious of the "internal". 

Tony: On Tue, 22 Apr 2025, at 10:29, "morning Adrian. What are your views on this 
Softness as regarding techniques. You can plainly see the Chinese influence. Tony"

Author's Note: When young, the mind is narrow but the body is broad. When old, the mind is expansive and the body is narrow. Both realities must be thoroughly acknowledged, understood, developed, and integrated. As the body ages, the enhanced awareness of the mind takes the place (and enthuses) the former youthful functioning of the (younger) body. When young, a mind without an enhanced awareness (which must be earned through experience) - is replaced by the blatant strength associated with youth - an important part of human survival and evolutionary development. Youthful strength is not an error - but a requirement in life. Traditional martial arts mastery is a different achievement which does not need to be accomplished by every human-being - but can be achieved by some dedicated individuals. Secular monasticism is a vehicle through which an individual can renounce attachment to private property and worldly cycles of self-hindering material accumulation.

Buddhist monasticism can serve as a vehicle for "emptying-out" the inner conditioning that arises from greed, hatred and delusion - as such - religion (and religious differences - including atheism and non-theism) does not have to enter into it. I suspect the ancient Greeks encountered Buddhist monasticism when visiting India (such as Pythagoras), learned the Buddhist method of "looking within", and then adjusted the technique as a means to "prove" the efficacy of their particular philosophical perspectives (the work of Plotinus may be taken as an example of this endeavour). Later, via the Greeks, a community of Jews (in Qumran) started sitting in meditation to personally attain a "glimpse of Yahweh" - a practice that eventually spread to the reformed Jewish sect of "Christianity" - whose adherents started to meditate whilst sat in the caves found in the Egyptian Desert (this type of Christianity spread to Britain - hundreds of years prior to Catholicism - becoming "Celtic Christianity").

​Buddhist monasticism does not require a belief in theism to be effective. Many Greek schools of thought, for instance, sought to establish or discover various views pertaining to the natural (material) world. The same observation can be applied to various Hindu school where consciousness and material environment is not directly associated with a theistic entity. Whatever the case, protecting the psychological and physical space within which a martial artist exists - is the entire purpose of any traditional Chinese martial arts school. Young or old - this is the beginning, middle, and end of legitimate Chinese martial practice! ACW (18.4.2025)

We can all become extraordinarily fit at different times throughout our lives. Part of the reality pertaining to physical and psychological fitness, evolves around the concept of developed understanding. In other words, the level of effective (physical) fitness evolves around the (psychological) maturity of the individual concerned. The greater the understanding of the processes involved – the more effective the fitness the greater is the efficiency of the required output – usually expressed through various sports (unless one happens to be a professional soldier). This is all well and good – but fighting for one’s life is not the same as fighting for a coloured belt, trophy, or medal, etc. One question I ask MMA practitioners – or any of the sporting martial arts practitioner  – is that if their art is so effective in reality, why is it that professional armed forces do not make use of these arts? The answer is that “sport” has gentlemanly rules which curb human aggression, and generate a climate of artificial “fairness” and “co-operation”. 

​For children, and young people, this is positive and nourishing (children should never be exposed to the horror or reality of warfare). When not in a war-like environment – civility should prevail - and sport is the preferred vehicle to encourage a “safe” competitiveness – although one unfortune by-product is that the selfish ego is boosted and inflated. Sport fighting is 90% imagination and only 10% reality – with full-contact martial arts, MMA, Thai Boxing, and Western Boxing, etc, representing the more realistic end of the spectrum. However, sport realism is not battlefield brutality. Dealing with the shock of battle might require stepping in (and through) human blood, entrails, or various types of human offal. People with smashed-bones will be screaming, shouting, laughing, and carrying-out all kinds of despicable acts - either permitted or forbidden by the established rules of war. Battlefield hand-to-hand combat is certainly not gentlemanly – and it is unrealistic to assume that it is. A Bayonet charge is all about high-energy and immense and continuous brutality until all the battle objectives are achieved – or the bayoneteer killed. This is just one example. 

​Drones are now causing all kinds of brutality on the Battlefield – and a coloured belt around the midriff is of no use whatsoever. Genuine traditional martial arts (usually types and variants “Longfist”) are employed by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of Mainland China. Physical and psychological robustness on the battlefield (not the training hall) is emphasised. These are soldiers who train in every relevant modern weaponry available – including the most destructive technological variants (weaponry is both tactical and strategic). A similar situation exists throughout Western armies where boxing and MMA are not used on the battlefield (although such pastimes might be encouraged as a form of military-related leisure). And yet despite this distinct “modernity” in weapon use – there is a belief that after all the firepower of the various weapon-systems have been exchanged - a battle might still be decided “man-to-man” in hand-to-hand during close-quarter combat. Eye-gouging, biting, head-butting, groin ripping, throat-crushing, finger-breaking, nose breaking, ear-ripping, knee-dislocation – and any number of similar nasty techniques are regularly used. 

​Real combat is about inequality. Real combat is about establishing (and maintaining) a terminal advantage over the enemy. Victory and survival are causally linked. Of course, the State does not care if its soldiers live or die (despite rhetoric to the opposite) – just as long as all the State’s military objectives are achieved for the least amount of money (not lives). Soldiers are expendable – because that is the function of being a soldier (someone who fights for pay). A mercenary is simply a soldier who fights for anyone who is willing to pay – regardless of cause and nation. The traditional Chinese martial artist trains his (or her) body to be able to perform this function (utter brutality) – whilst retaining a calm and expansive mind-state that is reflective and unruffled under duress. Traditional martial arts practice assumes the reality of the feudal battlefield – even if the practitioner is not serving in the armed forces of their respective countries (of course, an individual might or might not be a professional soldier – but a civilian practices martial arts with an enhanced sense of combat-reality whether living in a village, town, or a city). Assuming the traditional Chinese martial artist survives a) the ongoing and arduous training (which will be harsh with no material gains such as belts, medals, or trophies, etc) and b) any experiences of actual combat (either on the street or the battlefield). 

​If all these challenges are met, which will include regular (unpadded) sparring and “honour fights” – then the traditional Chinese martial artist must adjust to circumstances as the body “ages” and transforms through the experience of maturing (this includes illness, injury, and disability). The body changes and the mind-awareness deepens. The body is no longer young and will not manifest as a younger body normally does. Despite this, a lifetime of experience will shine through, and a natural dominance will emerge. An older practitioner will understand and control a situation involving younger people as opponents – because those younger people (although full of the vigour of youth) will not possess the ability to “perceive” what is happening – at least not to the extent of the elder and more experienced practitioner. For many years, a dedicated martial arts practitioner will always experience “confusion” whilst participating in the midst of unarmed combat. It is only as time progresses that a student’s mind will “calm” and a pristine awareness takes its place. Before this change can happen, however, many sporting martial arts practitioners cease training in their chosen martial art (early) usually in their late 20s or early 30s (not granting enough time for any substantial inner transformation to occur) – whereas traditional Chinese practitioners must carry-on practicing until the moment of their final breath – and the body is “given-up”. 

Dear Tony

​My teacher used to strike a pressure-point to the upper-calf area - which made all control in my entire leg to "cease". As a young man, my muscles were strong and fit - but being hit like this just wiped it all away. Initially, I fell down - but the lesson was to place my weight on my other leg and attempt to bring back the sensation and control - usually through stamping. Once I perfected this (on either leg) - the next step was for both calves to be hit simultaneously - with the calf muscles being suitably "tensed" to create a natural armouring (this is linked to TCM and Shiatsu points - as you already know).

​Of course, I cannot be sure - but I expect the Sensei in this video is performing this conditioning on his student (striking the back of the upper-calf) - whilst the student is carrying the weighted urns. Genuine pressure-point striking is extremely dangerous and cuts-through all conditioning and will-power.

My teacher once gently "pinched" together my shirt-collar - and the next thing I remember is opening my eyes and seeing everyone's feet as they stepped around my head. I thought I had woke-up in bed and had no immediate memory of what had just happened. I slowly realised I was lying on a wooden floor - and that I was fully dressed and amongst a group of people discussing blood-flow and blood-circulation. I had been out for about 10-seconds or so - but my experience seemed timeless. As I got up, my short-term memory returned. All important life lessons for martial arts practice. 

Dear Tony

中国传统长兵 虎叉
Chinese Traditional Long Weapon - Tiger Fork (Trident)

At the above link is a video of the Tiger Fork. I believe this is a Southern weapon the Hakka developed to protect their farm land, crops, and livestock from attack by a type of "leopard" - not really a "Tiger" (in the Indian sense) as the translation suggests. These leopards were small (about the stature of a medium-sized dog) - but ferocious like a wild-cat found in Scotland, the US and other places. These cats were thought to have gone extinct in the 1950s - but I understand some have been discovered in remote areas of China and are now a protected species. I never saw one when visiting the Chan ancestral village in the New Territories - but I was taught the fork as part of farming. If you notice, the leopard was known to close-in quickly and scramble all-over the victims body - biting a clawing as it went. The fork follows the supposed trajectory of such a fluid attack - seeking to deflect, trap, stab, and impale. The highly mobile fork is used as a shield - but its counter-measures give an idea of what the Tiger-Leopard was capable of doing. In other words, its attack protocol. 

Of course, the ideogram "虎" (hu3) is used to mean "Tiger" - as in the head, torso, feet, and tail of a "fierce", "brave" and "stern" creature - usually associated with an Indian or Siberian Tiger, but I suspect these creatures would easily smash-through this (Tiger Fork) weapon. Therefore, logically working backwards from the fork technique to the actions of the creature it is combatting - the animal must be smaller in stature - but equally dangerous to encounter in tooth and claw. I think a Leopard or Panther (豹bao4) if a far more likely culprit (literally a small animal shaped like a horse - but covered in spots). A Puma (彪biao3马ma3) - is an Asian Golden Cat (shaped like a small horse) - or a brightly coloured small tiger (which can also be Black or White in the case of a Snow Leopard). 

Tiger Fork Definition:

虎 (hu3) 叉 (cha1) - Tiger Fork (Trident)

虎 (hu3) = Ferocious small tiger-like cat

叉 (cha1) = Wooden shaft with metal trident head

The fork repels (pushes away) - traps (pins-down) and pulls the animal near for despatch. The older ideograms in fact show "two" forks coming together to interlock something trapped between them. This correlates with the idea of communal self-defence and the idea that more than one person at a time would be on duty protecting the boundary of the farming area. As Hakka are a practical people - this weapon would also be used to protect against physical attack from other humans. Indeed, I was taught to use the fork as a means to pin an attacker's feet to the ground - and to break their shins, etc. I think that the Tiger Fork is similar in design to the much more compact Okinawan "Sai" (釵Chai1) - (Japanese) Kan-on: さい (sai): 

The Chinese ideogram 釵 (Chai) is comprised of a left and right-hand particle:

Left-hand particle = 釒(jin1) a conjunction of "金" - consisting of the lower element of "士" (shi4) an upside ritualistic axe made of metal - which is multiplied by the power of two (hence "a lot of") through the middle element "丷" (ba1) - and concentrated in one-place for greater strength (亼ji2) in the upper element. 釵 (Chai) means a metal object of great (condensed) physical and spiritual strength.

Right-hand particle - 叉 (cha1) = in the old dictionaries - related to "study" and "archery" - that is good, correct, and enlightened behaviour. Basically a "right-hand" (又you4) - the outer element - which is skilfully used to grasp a desired object - hence a cultivated "skill" - used in writing with a brush-pen and firing a bow. Infact, the picture above is a left and right hand clasping one-another - representing the use of two Tiger Forks. The "丶" (zhu3) - as the middle element - represents iron ore (minerals) or probably "metal". 叉 (cha1) refers to a three-pronged, metal object used to "grasp" and "hold". 

It is said that 釵 (Chai) represents a "hair-pin" which may well be the case - as in the body clean and tidy is part of the Confucian teaching regarding correct, ritualistic behaviour. Arranging the hair is very much a part of correct behaviour. It would seem that the weapon was named after the hairpin. This would suggest that a Tiger Fork borrows the ideogram related to "hairpin" due to a similarity of shape - with the hairpin being older. A modern Chinese language dictionary states:

'This character was originally used in Japanese to mean (ornamental) hairpin, and was read with a kun'yomi of kanzashi. The similarity in shape between a hairpin and the weapon called a sai later led to this character being used to refer to the weapon. In modern Japanese, this character is read primarily with its on'yomi of sai, and is used to refer to the weapon. The hairpin sense and kanzashi reading are more often spelled 簪.' 

Many Thanks

​Adrian Chan-Wyles

This is a continuation of the dynamic-tension exercise as found within the Sanchin Kata. The Karate-ka grips an urn (瓮 – Game) with the finger-tips of both hands (simultaneously) [握 – Nigiri] – beginning in Sanchin-stance with the right-leg forward – the practitioner steps in Sanchin-stance up and down the training-hall (Dojo). Whilst the two weighted-jars (urns) are held to the left and right of the upper-thighs whilst being kept in the same orientation – the Sanchin-stance continuously switches from left to right-leg – and right to left-leg, etc.  The “root” to the ground must be maintained at all times – as if the feet are stuck to the floor – whilst being able to move smoothly when required. The feet are both “heavy” (rooted) and “light” (able to shift) without contradiction or hindrance (“步法” – [Suri-Ashi]). The musculature of the hands, finger-tips, and thumbs are all maintained in a state of concentrated tension. When the Urns are picked-up (at the beginning of the exercise) and laid-down (when the exercise is completed) – the knees are bent (as if “squatting”) with the right-leg forward. 

​Assessing the ideogram for “urn” the following can be ascertained:
​
瓮 (Jap: Game) [Chin: Weng4] = pottery urn, jar, jug, and container
瓮 is a variant of “甕” – the constituent particles of which are assessed below:
雍 (yong4) = upper particle – harmony, peace [ideogram constructed from water which is collected in one-place - such as a pool or a moat – from which a bird benefits]
瓦 (wa3) = lower particle – earthenware, pottery [ideogram constructed from from the concept of a building or roofing-tile - made from clay – extracted from the earth]

​The earthenware pot, urn, or jar – is a man-made structure which operates as a “barrier” designed to generate “order” through ensuring “harmony” in the physical environment. Substances placed in the jar are gathered in one-place – and held there without spilling or flowing away. That which is gathered in one-place – is held in good order and is free from error. Even in death, the traditional (Confucian) method involved cremation (or exhumation) – with the human remains cleaned and placed in a burial-urn. This urn was then placed in the “Name Temple” on display – associated with the surname dominant in the local village or town. As any substance can be placed in the Sanchin-Urns – the urns can vary in weight. Of course, the construction of the urns must be stronger than the grip a skilled Goju Ryu practitioner can assert upon the upper-lip area.

​Note: Following a request to explain “Nigiri” (握) or “gripping” – the following is relevant:
​
握 (Jap: Nigiri) [Chin: wo4] = strongly hold, grip, grasp, and control using the hands
扌(shou3) – left-particle = and open-hand – usually written as “手”
屋 (wu1) – right-particle = house, room, roof, and building

The open-hand grasps a structure (or device) which, (like a building in principle), gathers and contains other objects - all in one-place. 

​My expertise is in reading and translating pre-traditional, traditional, modern and simplified Chinese ideograms into British English. As many older Japanese terms are expressed in “traditional” Chinese ideograms (as in “握瓮 – Nigiri-Game”) – it is through the reading of these characters that I can intellectually enter the realm of the Japanese language - and interpret the thought-structures that underlie it. I have noticed, however, that the ideogram “瓮” (Game) within Japanese-language texts is pronounced both “game” and “kame” – why is there this difference? If “瓮” (“urn”) is placed at the beginning of a sentence (as in the first word), then it is pronounced “kame”, whilst if it is placed at the end of the sentence (as the final word), it is pronounced “game”. This is the convention operating within the written (and spoken) Japanese-lanvuage.
​
Given that “握瓮” (Nigiri-Game] is a concept applied within Okinawan Goju Ryu Karate-Do as “Sanchin-Game” (Three-Battles - Urn) [三戦 瓮) – the “瓮” (Game) appears at the end of the sentence, thus rendering the reading of “urn” or “jar” (the English transliteration is variable) as “game” (pronounced in English as “Gam Mi”). Of course, as Okinawa operates from a number of different language structures at any one-time - a combination of Chinese, Japanese, (indigenous) Okinawan, and South-East Asian (together with “English since the defeat of Imperial Japan in 1945) – the usual idioms and conventions expected in other languages - might - or might not – existentially operate. Assumptions of usage must be researched at the point of contact whenever encountered.

The Okinawans prefer to use the ideogram “瓮” for “game” – instead of “甕” (both pronounced “weng4”) the latter assessed above. The assumption is that both ideograms convey the same interpretation – albeit in slightly different ways:

​瓮 (Jap: game) [Chin: weng4]
​
Top-particle = 公 (gong1) – public, communal, official
Lower-particle = 瓦 (was3) – earthenware, pottery, roof-tile

This assessment seems to suggest that “瓮” refers to any earthenware-constructed objects which are used within human society – whilst placed on continuous public display - performing their intended function. Indeed, Japanese-language dictionaries suggest NOT an “urn” – but rather a “roof-tile”. The reading only becomes “urn” (jar) when read in the light of the “甕” ideogram – which clearly indicates a waterproof “container” or “vessel” constructed using clay. The “瓮” ideogram appears in the Seal Script (developed between 700 BCE-200 CE) – whilst there are NO ancient versions of the ideogram “甕”. This indicates that “瓮” is the older ideogram (used within Okinawan script) – whilst  “甕” is a later (clarifying) development. 

​A community is a group of people that live together in close proximity on a daily basis. This cooperation maybe loose in affiliation but consistent in existence. Passage in and out of the community can be fluid – whilst different sub-groups contribute to the cultural texture of the collective. When there is peace throughout the land – and there exists ample resources – then threats to any community will be at a minimum. However, should these conditions change at any time – then conflict might erupt both within and without the community structure. Scapegoating and buck-passing often leads to friction between different ethnic groups so that violence replaces peaceful discourse and profitable commerce. Violence becomes the only currency through which individuals and groups communicate.

​When this violent situation develops – it is often beyond the control of any single group or individual - and appears to take-on a life of its own. In other words, there is a force of motion away from peaceful co-existence and toward violent interaction. Human organisation reverts to primitive instincts similar to the situation portrayed during the beginning of the (1968) Stanley Kubrick film entitled “2001 – A Space Odyssey” – which sees a group of Hominids (early humans) suddenly develop the ability to use objects in the environment as “weapons” against one another. This evolutionary process quite literally changes the balance of tribal power around the local watering hole. The human brain develops an extraordinary power to dialectically “think” about the physical environment it inhabits – and together with an opposable thumb – the evolved human-being eventually develops advanced technology and space travel! 

Survival against external attack is the primary purpose of genuine self-defence. Although political and religious beliefs (which vary considerably from one culture to another) might contribute to fighting-spirit and the ability to self-sacrifice – these attributes should not distract from the primary point - which states that combat effectiveness equates to a greater chance of survival. This being the case, and given that we practice traditional (Hakka) Chinese martial arts, the broader point is not the specific conditions that define our martial reality – such as Buddhism, Daoism, and Confucianism (as well as Asian politics) – it is important to remember that we are also British and possess a rich texture of English and Irish cultural input, as well as Welsh and Scottish influence. All these things give us strength when we take our place in the frontline. Once we manifest our cultural strength of bravery and stoicism – it is the efficacy of our martial technique which will define the course of events.

In other words, regardless of cultural influence, the manner in which a fight (or combative experience) will unfold relies entirely upon the individual’s mastery of their mind and body - whilst experiencing extreme environmental pressure. In such a situation, “grace under pressure” is required – so that each punch, kick, elbow, or head-butt, etc – will be dodged when incoming - and landed cleanly when outgoing the moment such a blow is required to do so. The ideological programming of the aggressive opponent will be short-circuited by the superior martial technique of the group (or individual) being targeted – proving that correct martial training, positioning, and movement overcomes any purely "cerebral" ideological programming – regardless of what that ideology might (or might not) include. Simply believing something to a pathological extent will not necessarily generate the desired effect in the physical environment. Manic ideology is not enough to cause a lasting change – if various other groups retain a superior (and more realistic) approach to martial training. Genuine self-defence requires the perfect mastery of the martial moment. 

Translator's Note: My attention was recently drawn to the fact that Japan very rarely grants full Japanese citizenship to non-ethnic Japanese-born people - this includes Chinese and Koreans born in Japan (who have to carry ID cards to prove that they are NOT ethnically Japanese despite possessing a legal right to live in the country) - but the Japanese government did eventually grant Welshman "CW Nicol" (1940-2020) full Japanese citizenship in 1995 after he had lived in the country for many decades as a person of permanent status. In his 1975 book entitled "Moving Zen - Karate as a Way to Gentleness" - CW Nicol describes an encounter he had with an ethnic Chinese Master of Taijiquan - also living in Japan. I have included this story below - interspersed with a newspaper article regarding a Japanese Exhibition celebrating the life of CW Nicol held in 2020! ACW (20.8.2020)

Dear Gillian

For me, it is cultivating the method of "seeing through" the veil which obscures the divine (or the "substantive"). Some people can see it just as they are from their default place of standing - but I have needed to create or cultivate this vision - so as to remove the obscuring block. I have got quite far in this quest over the decades - to the point where I can see how other paths work. Indeed, other paths are now useful to me - where once I pushed them away. Now, I can see the "divine" ("void") in the "ordinary" ("form"). The dross of life - that which we accrue in life and leave behind in death - often means it is never easy. But effort is divine, as you already know. 

Practicing Taijiquan in the early morning (the or evening - when this picture was taken)  is when the air (qi) is at its most inspiring and invigorating! At the moment, although the temperature was -7 last week - today it is +10 degrees Celsius. Whatever the case, the air is cool and fresh and seems to permeate every cell of the body - despite the fact that in reality the breath enters and leaves through the nose and/or mouth. Of course, I am told that a small amount of oxygen leaves and enters through the pours of the skin - but too little for the entire body to exist upon. Still, when breathing deeply (into the lower Dantian) the complete lower lung capacity is utilised giving the feeling that a 'power' or 'entity' is dropping into the lower abdominal area (traditionally two-inches below the naval).

I find it interesting that this special area (which is probably lower than two-inches in reality) coincides with the actual centre of gravity relating to the human (physical) body. The mastering of 'breath' is inherently linked to the mastery of 'balance' and 'movement' all mediated through an enhanced 'rootedness'. The clarified and purified 'awareness' of the mind directs all this activity - which includes the harnessing of the rising (rebounding) force that emanates from the dropped bodyweight impacting with the ground. The dropped bodyweight and rising force is channelled through the epicentre of the perfectly 'aligned' bone-structure (skeleton) which is never lost despite the complexity of the movement involved.

​Of course, part of the qigong used to prepare the practitioner for Taijiquan practice is 'Standing Like a Stake' also termed 'Holding the Ball' - where an individual stands perfectly 'still' both physically and psychologically. We become like a mighty tree which can withstand any weather or unexpected external force! Within the peacefulness of the well-rooted tree is an immense power waiting to be discovered, harnessed and manifest! 

​As regards 'tradition', 'lineage' and 'respect' - these are aboth fundamental Chinese cultural aspects which were brought suddenly into the modern world in 1911 (the ‘Nationalist’ Revolution) and 1949 (the ‘Socialist’ Revolution). In Japan, this process began with the Meiji Restoration of 1868. This all evolves around the concept of 'face' (面子 - Mian Zi) - or the ability to walk through the public spaces with one's dignity fully intact and face on display. To traverse the public spaces used to demand a stern adherence to the teachings of 'Confucius' as defined by various philosophers and politicians, etc. Indeed, Confucianism regulated not only the society of China for over two-thousand years, but also many other countries including Korea, Japan, Vietnam and Okinawa (including large areas of South-East Asia). Furthermore, wherever Chinese people have migrated - Confucianism has followed. Confucianism still defines Chinese society, but the way this happens has evolved over the centuries and can still seem baffling to the uninitiated. Regardless of this, understanding ‘Confucianism’ is the only way ‘in’ and ‘out’ of a Chinese cultural grouping.

​In the old days, breaking these rules led to the breaking of one's body - a simple correlation between spiritual morality and physical punishment. The individual body used to be the property of one's parents and belonged to the State (that is to the 'Emperor'). The body of a child used to represent the continuation of a family's ancestral 'Qi' energy and the lasting of the Clan Surname. Judicial execution often involved public beheading (the 'loss' of face through the loss of the head) – a punitive process which usually including the killing of all members of the same family (depending upon the severity of the offense). Social execution involved the 'exclusion' of an individual and a family (Clan) - from all meaningful social interaction. It is interesting to note that despite the differences in political and economic view that exist between Beijing and Taipei, for instance, Chinese people living in Taiwan and Mainland China would agree (both implicitly and explicitly) about what 'face' is, and about what 'losing' and 'saving' face actually entails - so important is this central aspect of Chinese culture. 

​Today, the forces of modernity have radically redefined this tradition - but occasionally murders and beatings do still occur throughout Chinese society - usually involving disputes regarding love affairs, relationship betrayals and intimate deviations, etc. Of course, if an individual is known to have behaved in a terrible fashion for whatever reason, social ostracization tends to follow. Remember, China is comprised of 56 ethnicities which enlarged through the Chinese diaspora as it intermixes with different people throughout the world. This means that 'saving face' and 'losing face' tends to vary in interpretation. For instance, my modern academic colleagues in China tend not to give 'face' much consideration - but the older members of our Chinese family still live their lives by this concept! Okinawa, for instance, is still being punished by the Mainland Japanese for being historically ‘Chinese’ – and this has involved the post-1945 US Military Bases being lodged of the Island. This US neo-imperialist presence has been compounded by an assault on Ryukyu culture that has been intended to eradicate all obvious ‘Chinese’ cultural tendencies and replace these with a blend of Americana and Nipponisation. Yet the robustness of the Okinawan way of life stands inherently strong – with an older version of ‘Confucian’ ideology lurking firmly in the background and regulating the martial arts, leisure and business communities. 

​Indeed, the Chinese concept of 'face' (面子 - Mian Zi) literally translates as 'Face Child' or 'Face Master'. The second ideogram '子' (zi3) means 'a child that is born already old and wise' - and is associated with 'Laozi' (老子) - one of the founders of Daoism. Perhaps 'Saving Face' would be better redefined as 'Preserving Face'. In England we talk of proudly holding our heads-up high in public.. Of course, in the strict Confucian model, the onus is on the individual rather than the social collective. Today, the social collective is just as responsible as the individual - so that the entirety of society works together to preserve the status quo. Now, it is as if the collective society has its own 'face' that has to be preserved in the 'face' of individual behaviour. It is a two-way street. Individual responsibility is now balanced with collective responsibility - creating a preserving 'tension' of positive interaction. An individual's 'face' is considered secondary and is only saved when the 'face' of orderly society is acknowledged and preserved. Having explained all this, there still exist pockets of Chinese culture spread throughout the world that uphold older versions of ‘Confucian’ ideology and expect all incomers to understand and respect this reality.